June 10th 2009

Quote Of The Day: Vrrooom Or Doom?

“I don’t know anything about cars.” – Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., Newly Annointed Chairman Of GM

I

really can’t believe I’m in America, reading in American media what an American president is doing to an American enterprise.  But I am.  It is true.  The government has named a new chairman for General Motors.  Not the GM board of directors, not the shareholders, but Steven Rattner, Obama’s car czar, who knows about as much about cars as the new chairman, Edward Whitacre.

This is far more radical than anything I thought Obama would be able to pull off, even in eight years, let alone 14 weeks.  Following on yesterday’s SCOTUS decision which said, basically, a contract is no longer a contract so investors can expect no protections, the critical condition of glorious American capitalism could not be more apparent.  I worry that it will not survive until 2010′s mid-term elections.

Whitacre was picked for two reasons.  The published one is that he guided AT&T through the transition from land-based wire telephone carrier to a leader in the wireless industry.  The Obamaites see a similar future for GM, with it transforming from a market-driven car company to a government-driven car company, manufacturing cars Big Brother wants us to drive, whether we want to or not.

The unspoken reason for his selection is because Whitacre can be counted on to do what government tells him to do, as was evident when he quickly (and rightly) acquiesced to government pressure to open AT&T’s hardware to the feds for post-9/11 surveillance purposes.  Not all telcom CEOs folded so quickly to government pressure, and since folding to government pressure is what’s in store for GM, Whitacre will make an ideal Obama-era chairman for the company.

The appointment should infuriate the Left.  Besides being a lackey to George Bush’s gestapo security machine, Whitacre received a peon-snubbing $158.8 million retirement package from AT&T and was involved in some pretty brutal corporate downsizings (probably in no small part due to shifting jobs overseas).  Oh, and let’s not forget that under his tenure AT&T censored (oops!) a Pearl Jam concert right when the band was blasting George Bush.

But Daily Kos has nothing posted on him as of his hour.  Democratic Underground? Mum.  [By the way, I typed "democraticunderground" instead of "democraticunderground.com," and was redirected to one of those stupid sponsored-link pages.  Guess who came out on top?  Barbara Boxer!] As for Huffington Post, which as I predicted in a tweet earlier today leads with how Homeland Security foresaw today’s attack on the Holocaust Museum in its report on right-wing radicalism, it also couldn’t find a reason to cover – let alone criticize – Whitacre’s appointment.

Of course not.  They know what’s going on.  Their long-awaited revolution is happening and they don’t want to crow about it too early because suddenly they’re very concerned about the enemy getting wind of our intentions.  Not al-Qaeda – tell them anything - they don’t want their enemy, normal Americans, to wake up to what’s going on.  No, they want to be much further down the road to economic ruin in the name of wealth redistribution before they haul out the red flags and have a victory parade.

Share

No Comments yet »

May 2nd 2009

Obama’s Search And Destroy Mission

P

erhaps you’re not aware of the mission Obama has tasked to senior officials in his administration. No, it’s not to re-start the economy, or even to become the world’s best new friend.  No, the orders are simple:  Seek out free enterprise wherever it exists, and squash it.

If that’s not bothersome enough, the fact that evidence for existence of the mission can be found on NPR, National People’s Radio, is a bit eye-opening.  It’s in this interview of Obama EPA chief Lisa Jackson. Roll the tape:

Jackson: “The President has said-and I couldn’t agree more-that what this country needs is one single national road map that tells auto makers who are trying to become solvent again, what kind of car it is they need to be designing and building for the American people.”

NPR reporter (interrupting): “Is that the role of the government, though? I mean that doesn’t sound like free enterprise.”

Jackson: “Well…it is free enterprise in a way…you know, first and foremost the free enterprise system has us where we are right this second…and so some would argue that the government already has a much larger role than we might have when Henry Ford rolled the first cars off the assembly line.”

Jackson can’t find any way to call the fed’s takeover and ongoing control of the automobile sector “free enterprise,” so she simply decides to blame the free economy for the nation’s ills. No, no, it’s not government over-regulation to date, demanding ever more expensive pollution and safety technology that’s to blame, nor is it labor’s unwillingness to face new economic realities that’s behind Detroit’s trouble. It’s not government’s considerable efforts to push the economy into the credit deficit by demanding mortgages be given to people who charitably can be called uncreditworthy.

It’s just that #$%@! free enterprise system that’s to blame.

According to her EPA bio, Jackson has never held a job in the private sector. What a shock.

Share

No Comments yet »

March 10th 2009

De-Politicizing Affordable Housing

A

s a public affairs guy with clients in the land development business, one of the issues that is always on the agenda is affordable housing; specifically, how to avoid being taken to the cleaners because some politician wants to get some votes at the developer’s expense by forcing false affordability into the free market. 

My, my, my.  How things have changed.

It was just a year or so ago that cities were passing ordinance mandating that new development provide ten or 15 percent of units at market rate or lower.  For a developer of market rate or higher developments, this was akin to ordering Saks that 15 percent of its clothes would henceforth have to be Walmart priced.  Not only would Saks give up floorspace that could have gone to clothing with higher profit margins, but Saks’ snotty upscale customers wouldn’t really like sharing the store with those Walmart shoppers. 

But after years of political grandstanding on the affordable housing issue, politicians have forgotten every promise they made, every threat they uttered about the horrible societal cost of rising home prices and are pouring their passion (and our money) into the need to keep home prices up.  The absurdity would be delightful if it weren’t so dangerous, as Thomas Sowell points out today:

The same politicians who have been talking about a need for “affordable housing” for years are now suddenly alarmed that home prices are falling. How can housing become more affordable unless prices fall?

The political meaning of “affordable housing” is housing that is made more affordable by politicians intervening to create government subsidies, rent control or other gimmicks for which politicians can take credit.

Affordable housing produced by market forces provides no benefit to politicians and has no attraction for them.

Here’s what will happen if Congress doesn’t intervene, in Sowell’s eyes and mine:  People who didn’t save for a rainy day or who bought beyond their means will lose their homes and move into apartments.  People who were saving for a rainy day and living within their means will move out of apartments and into now-affordable homes.

What a nightmare!

Strong, nasty-tasting medicine is all the economy needs right now, but Franklin Delano Obama is intent on re-establishing the warm, comforting governmental teat that Ronald Reagan worked so hard to stuff back into the bra. It’s a shame and a disaster, but the majority of Americans are ready to sacrifice the beautiful efficiency and freedom of the free market in the name of a thin security blanket imported from China.

Share

No Comments yet »

September 19th 2008

$1,000,000,000,000

O

ne trillion dollars.  That’s a good guess for how much the federal government has committed to bailing out financial institutions that, on advise of their own private employees, used private money to make appallingly risky investments.

I did not elect anyone to do this.  Did you?  Do you know anyone who did?

Did you notice how quickly Sen. On-the-Take Dodd and his cohorts (Dem and GOP) jumped on the opportunity to put off this generation’s ineptitudes and sins to future generations, when they’re out of office?  Did you elect anyone to burden your grandchildren with this debt?  Do your grandchildren and great-grandchildren even have a voice to protest?  Mine don’t; they’re not born yet.

Can anyone show me where in the Constitution it allows for the government to do this sort of thing?  Please. Let me know.

I understand this is a once-in-a-century thing and radical solutions just might save us from a disaster powerful enough to hurt us all and long enough to burn into history.  I understand that the intervention in this case may be the smartest route not be a complete denial of responsibility or a disastrous precedence.

But I also understand that intervention means the people who behaved reprehensibly and destroyed entire companies because of their horribly bad judgment and twisted values, putting thousands of innocents out of work, will be cushioned from the fate they deserve.  And without a public flogging, we can expect to see them live to screw up another day.

Share

2 Comments »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here