February 13th 2009

Fighting Rahmbama On Census Giving GOP A Spine

R

ahmbama has stepped in it, and the stink isn’t washing off.  The Deceptive Duo’s attempt to move the Census to the White House so they can play Chicago ward politics with it has sparked more outrage than even Porkasaurus Socialistum, the stimulus spending bill – and none too soon.  The GOP, seemingly on the verge of being reclassified an invertibrate, is finding its spine again.

House Republican leaders said Thursday they’re ready to go to court against President Obama if he doesn’t scuttle his plan to move the census into the purview of the Oval Office, saying it’s an unconstitutional abuse of power. …

Under Obama’s plan, the director of the U.S. Census Bureau, who has yet to be named, would report to White House senior management in addition to the Commerce Department, which oversees the bureau.

A Senate committee has scheduled a hearing next month on the potential change. Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee are also pushing for an investigation.

GOP leaders sent Obama a letter to the White House on Wednesday demanding a reversal of the plan.

“If the president doesn’t acquiesce to our letter, then we will seek the courts,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., a ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said at a news conference Thursday. (Fox)

That’s what I want to hear!  Obama promised an open administration and this outrage flies in the face of that promise. He deserves a long, hard, embarassing spotlight on this one, and I am glad to see the GOP is ready to shine it on him, instead of just shining it on.

Michelle Malkin linked to a post by former Census director Bruce Chapman in Discovery Blog:

It would be more expedient for the White House to have a pliable Secretary of Commerce in place if the aim is to “re-evaluate” the conduct of the 2010 Census in order to introduce adjustment of results through sampling and computer modeling. Gregg presumably would not have gone along–and would have been hard to run over.

But the legal issues will remain even if a willing partisan is nominated and confirmed as Commerce Secretary. There is a 1999 Supreme Court ruling that would make sampling-based adjustment difficult in the absence of compelling evidence that the customary hard count would be less credible. And that evidence not only is lacking, but a three year statistical study that was finished in 2003 to respond to this issue concluded just the opposite: adjusting the Census numbers through sampling and computer models could lead to a less credible Census result. A hard count has always been legally defensible. A fuzzy “adjusted” Census–where figures at the Census tract and block level would be demonstrably erroneous in many cases–could invite endless litigation and bad will.

Another problem for the Obama White House if it wants to change the Census approach: planning for the 2010 Census has been underway for years and now is in preparation for testing. The disruptions caused by an Administration decision to change those plans would cause great problems and probably agitate the resistance of career statisticians charged with responsibility for conducting the Census.

So, you see that while the vision was audacious, the execution was naive.  Rahmbama thinks the November vote provides a mandate for crapping on the Constitution and shuttling all promises of openess, but they’re not getting away with this one easily.

And here’s the kicker from Chapman:

Finally, one wonders if the President understands that the Census is a function of government that requires not only integrity in fact but also the appearance of integrity. The reputation of the Census should not be compromised. It is hard enough to get people to cooperate in the conduct of the Census without creating a reputation for politicization.

OBVIOUSLY, the Census must be above politicization, and the fact that Rhambama didn’t think this important enough to be a barrier shows an utter lack of integrity, a commitment to move America as far to the left as possible in the years they have in power.

And they quickness of their moves makes me think they may not be counting on getting a second four years.

Share

4 Comments »

December 18th 2008

Rahm Probs, Big And Small

Rahm Emanuel continues to bring problems to the nascent Obama administration, starting with the teensy little item of having to apologize to the global Muslim community.  I’d missed this when it broke, but it’s rich and definitely worth including in the Obama Swamp:

Representative Rahm Emanuel, resident-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff, called the president of an Arab-American group today to apologize for comments his father made to an Israeli newspaper.

In the remarks, Benjamin Emanuel discussed the potential impact of his son’s new position on U.S.-Israeli relations.

“Obviously he’ll influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to be mopping floors at the White House,” the elder Mr. Emanuel told the Israeli daily Ma’ariv, according to English-language reports in The Jerusalem Post and The Jewish Telegraphic Agency. (NYT, emphasis added)

Oh, the un-PC-ness of it! The exact wording of Emanuel’s apology wasn’t disclosed; too bad, it was probably a very interesting document.

On to the bigger problems: Yesterday’s disclosure that Emanuel had spoken to Blagojevich 21 times regarding Obama’s vacant (and valuable) Senate seat.  Here’s the Chicago Sun Times:

President-elect Barack Obama’s incoming chief of staff Rahm Emanuel had a deeper involvement in pressing for a U.S. Senate seat appointment than previously reported, the Sun-Times has learned. Emanuel had direct discussions about the seat with Gov. Blagojevich, who is is accused of trying to auction it to the highest bidder.

Emanuel talked with the governor in the days following the Nov. 4 election and pressed early on for the appointment of Valerie Jarrett to the post, sources with knowledge of the conversations told the Sun-Times. There was no indication from sources that Emanuel brokered a deal, however.

A source with the Obama camp strongly denied Emanuel spoke with the governor directly about the seat, saying Emanuel only spoke with Blagojevich once recently to say he was taking the chief of staff post.

But sources with knowledge of the investigation said Blagojevich told his aides about the calls with Emanuel and sometimes gave them directions afterward. (emphasis added)

Once again, Obama’s staff has goofed up and embarrassed the boss. With this many gross mishandlings of the Blagojevich scandal, it’s beginning to seem like Obama really might have something to hide, despite all the assurances to the contrary … especially as Obama refused to answer questions again today, using the Fitzgerald dodge:

At a news conference, Obama did not respond directly to a question about a Tribune report linking his chief of staff designee, Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, to discussions over the Senate pick with a top Blagojevich aide. Emanuel, on the sidelines for this conference, declined to answer questions. (Chi Trib)

The Fitzgerald stall has a particularly nifty thing going for it:  It ensures that when the report on Obama staff contacts with Blagojevich finally is released, the PEOTUS will be on vacation in Hawaii and off limits to reporters.  How nice.

Share

No Comments yet »

December 12th 2008

The Best Blago Line Yet?

I

n an otherwise useless, GOP-slapping, Dem-loving bit of blathering reporting on the Blagojevich insanity, Salon’s Joan Walsh passed along this gem in her coverage of yesterday’s too-short press conference:

Obama looked like the happiest man in history ever to be called a “m—–f—–.”

But a more significant line might be this one from Capt. Ed, about the clip below, made even more significant now that Rahm Emanuel isn’t showing up for work because of “death threats.”

Emanuel has been acting like someone advised him to keep quiet to keep from making incriminating public statements, and this may be the reason why.

Here’s the clip – all about Emanuel’s many conversations with Blagojevich about filling Obama’s’ Senate seat.  Sure, Emanuel would be the point man on such a deal … but just as sure, he wasn’t forthcoming about it, and he’s just another Chicago pol who’s been swimming in the Chicago political cesspool throughout his career, and he’s next to the prez-elect.

Share

No Comments yet »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here