<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/media-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McFarland</title>
		<link>http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/media-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>James McFarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/CSM/?page_id=5526#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>Every human has at least some degree of bias on many different issues.  Probably the more intelligent and especially the more passionite people have more and stronger biases than those who are neither intelligent or passionite.  It is probably also true that reporters are generally both intelligent and passionite, and if so it stands to reason that reporters are definitely biased; to be otherwise would take them out of the realm of being human.
 
I realize that &quot;The View&quot; is not a news program, but even so the women on it feel as though they have every right to rant on and on concerning their favorite Presidental candidate.  I happened on such a rant on &quot;You-Tube&quot; earlier, and I was discussed to see the way four women ganged up on the fifth panelist simply because they are all liberal and she is a conservative.  I can&#039;t for the life of me understand how or why the consevative panelist stays on the show considering the fact that they can&#039;t let even finish a sentence, let alone actually having the opportunity to have a whole couple of minutes to present her position.
 
Keep up the good work,  Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every human has at least some degree of bias on many different issues.  Probably the more intelligent and especially the more passionite people have more and stronger biases than those who are neither intelligent or passionite.  It is probably also true that reporters are generally both intelligent and passionite, and if so it stands to reason that reporters are definitely biased; to be otherwise would take them out of the realm of being human.<br />
 <br />
I realize that &#8220;The View&#8221; is not a news program, but even so the women on it feel as though they have every right to rant on and on concerning their favorite Presidental candidate.  I happened on such a rant on &#8220;You-Tube&#8221; earlier, and I was discussed to see the way four women ganged up on the fifth panelist simply because they are all liberal and she is a conservative.  I can&#8217;t for the life of me understand how or why the consevative panelist stays on the show considering the fact that they can&#8217;t let even finish a sentence, let alone actually having the opportunity to have a whole couple of minutes to present her position.<br />
 <br />
Keep up the good work,  Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newzworth</title>
		<link>http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/media-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Newzworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/CSM/?page_id=5526#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your honesty, Laer.
As this election has exposed, the media can no longer be trusted at their word. God forbid a re-enactment of the &quot;Fairness Doctrine&quot;. It&#039;s not that the voices on the radio are not biased, but because without both extremes, its difficult to discern truth, bias, fiction, and opinion without something to weigh against.  I look forward to frequenting your blog more often.
~Newzworth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your honesty, Laer.<br />
As this election has exposed, the media can no longer be trusted at their word. God forbid a re-enactment of the &#8220;Fairness Doctrine&#8221;. It&#8217;s not that the voices on the radio are not biased, but because without both extremes, its difficult to discern truth, bias, fiction, and opinion without something to weigh against.  I look forward to frequenting your blog more often.<br />
~Newzworth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

