L

ost in all the glossy Olympics hoopla is the fact that China is a sick, sick country, where fast economic growth combines with a lack of Western values and sound courts. And lost (nearly) in the economic and election news of the last week is the Chinese milk scandal, the latest disaster in this country of ethical (not just earthquake) disasters.

So far, milk tainted with melamine has killed four infants and sickened 6,200 – in just the last week. Of those 6,200 babies, 1,300 babies are in hospitals and 158 have acute kidney failure.

What, pray tell, is melamine and why would you put it in milk?

The scandal began with complaints over milk powder by Sanlu Group Co. — one of China’s best-known and most respected brands. But it quickly became a much larger problem as government tests found that one-fifth of the companies producing baby milk powder had melamine in their products.

Melamine is a toxic industrial chemical that can cause kidney stones and lead to kidney failure. It has no nutritional value but is high in nitrogen, making products with it appear higher in protein. Suppliers trying to cut costs are believed to have added it to watered-down milk to cover up the resulting protein deficiency. (source)

And now there are reports that the Chinese government was aware of the scandal before the Olympics, but covered it up – at the cost of infants’ lives – in order to keep, as they say, the lipstick on the pig.

First they killed the school kids with substandard construction in schools. Now they’re killing the newborns with lax or non-existent oversight of food production.

Deprived of Judeo-Christian morals and used to absolute, state-first, people-second power, the Beijingoists have a lot to learn about being decent human beings. And with a huge army on their side and no free elections, they have little motivation to learn. As such, today China is the global symbol of the evil of greed and power.

1 Comment »

“To achieve Olympic glory for the motherland is the sacred mission assigned by the Communist Party central.” – Liu Peng, Chinese Sports Minister

C

hina, a country that doesn’t offer its citizens health care, job safety, environmental protection or retirement benefits anywhere near those of advanced nations, spent $41 billion on the Olympics, netting 51 gold medals for its efforts.

While the US won the most medals, China won more gold – a glorious accomplishment, but one that came at a huge price to the athletes. In an article that is anything but full of surprises, the LA Times tells us:

The only mother on China’s team, Xian Dongmei, told reporters after she won her gold medal in judo that she had not seen her 18-month-old daughter in one year, monitoring the girl’s growth only by webcam. Another gold medalist, weightlifter Cao Lei, was kept in such seclusion training for the Olympics that she wasn’t told her mother was dying. She found out only after she had missed the funeral.

Chen Ruolin, a 15-year-old diver, was ordered to skip dinner for one year to keep her body sharp as a razor slicing into the water. The girl weighs 66 pounds. …

“You have no control over your own life. Coaches are with you all the time. People are always watching you, the doctors, even the chefs in the cafeteria. You have no choice but to train so as not to let the others down,” gymnast Chen Yibing told Chinese reporters last week after winning a gold medal on the rings. He said he could count the amount of time he’d spent with his parents “by hours . . . very few hours.”

There are certainly more stories like these, that show China for what it is: A land where 1.3 billion people are all servants to the will of the state. The American athletes who come from a country where the state is (miraculously) still the servant of the people had a very different Olympic experience.

The contrast couldn’t be greater than between the Chinese and U.S. athletes. In their post-match interviews, the Americans rambled on about their parents, their siblings, their pets, their hobbies. They repeatedly used the word fun.

Behind the visual glory of the Olympics, the real China showed through. Proud, powerful, for sure – but with a massive population used to being forced to do whatever the state asks of them, and ready to sacrifice for the Party’s glory.

Thank God the goal here was merely Olympic gold. Think what they could do if the goal were something more globally significant. Like, oh, California.

No Comments yet »

D

espite myself, despite Tibet, despite their spying for our military secrets, despite NBC’s blatant favoritism in the campaign, despite so much, I turned on the high-def opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics last night, and for the next several hours, my family watched, transfixed. And frightened.

The transfixion came from the creative scope of the ceremony and the technology necessary to carry it out. Looking at the genius of the show, I found myself thinking, “The Russians couldn’t do that. It’s not in their culture.” Then I had to ask myself if we could. Sure, culturally we’ve got what it takes, but do we have the know-how and precision? I just don’t know.

The fear came first when Chinese soldiers took the nation’s flag from a group of 56 colorfully dressed children, each representing one of China’s ethnic groups (but woe be to the 55 who aren’t ethnic Chinese Han), and goose-stepped it with heartless precision to the flag pole.

I thought, are these the same soldiers who shoot tax-cheaters in the back of the head? Who arrived in Lhasa and Tiananmen Square to squelch freedom? Who pound on the doors of the home churches, ready to interrogate the Christians within?

Ready to go to war with us?

Of course the Chinese wanted to show the world that they’re friendly, welcoming and advanced. We all noted that, and thanks for the comfort it brings, really. But those frozen-faced, goose-stepping soldiers and the big red flag. My fear was primordial, Cold War going hot, and with every micro-element of the show carefully programmed, I had to wonder from what dark recess those few moments came.

The second fear overcame me at the end of what was the most beautiful segment of the show, when Confucians in exquisite flowing robes right out of Star Wars surrounded a field of moving Chinese type (the Chinese, not Guttenburg, invented moving type, we were told by the all-knowing Bob Costas). The geometric movements of the type were on so a vast scale – at least 500 separate type pieces by my calculation from the photo – and of such precision, as the pieces rose and fell to form moving ripples, the Great Wall, ocean waves, that I convinced myself and Incredible Wife that they just had to be mechanical and computer programmed.

But in the end, the caps of the type columns opened, and out popped the smiling heads of hundreds of young Chinese men. How did they do that? They couldn’t see each other, each within his own column, so how did they stay so precise?*

That’s when the second chill overcame me. Who are these guys? How is it they can do what we seemingly can’t? If you ever combined the fearful, rigid power of the goose-stepping soldiers (oh, and their gold medal-winning marksmanship … and knife-wielding skills] with the mystifying precision of the typeface dancers, you would have a force the world would have difficulty reckoning with.

And last night, the Chinese did just that.

* I figured it out the box trick, and it is neither hard nor frightening.  My take:  Headsets that directed an audio command 1, 2, 3, corresponding to crouch, flex knee, stand up.  Reader Roy Lofquist got it better – three lights inside the box.  Still, China’s put on a beautiful, intimidating show.

Photos: Top two and bottom from a beautiful NYT spread; third from China News

3 Comments »

L

ike Twoface from Batman, China is showing the sunny, progressive side of its face to the world this week as the Olympics near. But it just can’t help itself, so its dark, despotic face is being shown to the world as well:

Olympic gold medalist and outspoken Darfur activist Joey Cheek has had his visa revoked by the Chinese embassy, hours before the speedskating champion was set to fly to China. And he wasn’t even planning on wearing a mask when he got there.

Chinese officials don’t need a reason to revoke anyone’s visa but, in their eyes, they had plenty of reasons to snatch Cheek’s. He is the founder of Team Darfur, a group of 70 athletes whose goal it is to raise global awareness of the human-rights violations taking part in the Darfur region of Sudan. China’s military, economic and diplomatic ties to Sudan have been well-publicized in the lead-up to the Games. …

Cheek was going to China to support the athletes on Team Darfur — including soccer player Abby Wambach — and to promote the cause, one that he has championed for years. After winning gold in the Torino Games, Cheek announced he was donating his $25,000 USOC bonus to Darfur and implored his sponsors to do the same. (Yahoo Sports)

News of China’s action is no doubt spreading through Beijing’s Olympic Village this morning and hopefully will encourage athletes to take advantage of the games’ global audience to embarrass China about its behavior in Darfur … and Tibet … and Zimbabwe … and Bolivia … and the list goes on.

No Comments yet »

“The Chinese have haughtily ignored our warnings. The Turkestan Islamic Party volunteers… have started urgent actions.”

S

o said Commander Seyfullah, head of the Turkestan Islamic Party, a Uighur separatist/Islamist group in China’s Muslim-dominated XinJiang province, in a recently released tape, “Our Blessed Jihad in Yunnan.” The tape arrived along with bombs – bus attacks that killed five in Shanghai and Yunnan last week, and today – four days before the start of the Olympic Games:

Sixteen Chinese policemen have been killed in an attack on a border post in the restive Muslim region of Xinjiang, state media say.

Two attackers reportedly drove up to the post in a rubbish truck and threw two grenades, before moving in to attack the policemen with knives. …

Both attackers were captured during the raid near the city of Kashgar, Xinhua state news agency reported. (BBC)

Another much less violent demonstration occurred in Beijing, in which people who had homes destroyed in order to build Olympic facilities clashed with police.

Which is more troubling to Beijing: violent jihad in the far-flung west, or demonstrations almost under the nose of Olympic visitors? Certainly Jihad poses a greater risk, but hometown demonstrations pose the potential for greater loss of face.

The Turkestan terrorists get no sympathy from me, but it’s interesting to watch and compare China’s response to homegrown Jihad with that of the West. Multiculturalism and deeply entrenched and fair judicial systems define our response; a heavy fist clamping down from on high defines that of the Chinese.

I’m rooting for the West. It would be great if a good society, reacting firmly but fairly, is able to squelch Jihad. But just in case the Chinese approach works better, let’s pay attention and learn lessons.

Art: The Smallest Minority

4 Comments »

T

he Chinese are hobbling the Internet for the Olympics – not a surprise. The surprise is how the left is reacting.

A couple examples of hobbling. First, BBC reports on the restrictions journalists will face when they log on in the People’s Republic:

Journalists covering the Beijing Olympic Games will not have completely uncensored access to the internet, Chinese and Olympic officials say.

Sites related to spiritual group Falun Gong would be blocked, officials said. Journalists also found they could not see some news or human rights websites.

The timing of the blockade was interesting. As the first of an anticipated 20,000 journalists descended on Beijing to cover the games, Amnesty International issued a report on how China’s miserable human rights record has gotten even worse with the Olympics. Journalists visiting China couldn’t access it, but the Beijingoists couldn’t stop people elsewhere around the globe from accessing the report, however, so the ban is comically inadequate.

Another example, from AP, is China’s forcing of foreign owned hotels to comply with China’s Public Security Service demand that they install software blocking their guests’ access to the sites of human rights, Falun Gong, Tibetan activists and others. (Chinese owned hotels don’t need any forcing by the way; they know the drill.) Senator Sam Brownback said of this:

“These hotels are justifiably outraged by this order, which puts them in the awkward position of having to craft pop-up messages explaining to their customers that their Web history, communications, searches and key strokes are being spied on by the Chinese government.”

The purpose of China’s efforts is not to protect the Chinese people from any threat, it is merely to spare the nation’s Communist rulers embarrassment on their home court. Behind the heavy-handed Olympic efforts is a much more sinister and far-flung machinery that monitors all Chinese communications from the Internet to the backyard fence that results in the arrest, imprisonment and frequent execution of anyone deemed to be an enemy of the state.

The difference between China’s use of electronic surveillance and America’s use seems to be lost on the left. In his Salon column today, Glenn Greenwald leaps effortlessly and brainlessly from the Chinese pressure on hotels to U.S. cooperation with telcom companies to monitor terrorists’ calls.

The precise financial dynamic which Sen. Brownback is impotently protesting in China — that corporations are highly incentivized to assent to and enable all government spying lest they lose extremely lucrative government contracts (and, conversely, that they’re eager to cooperate with the Government in order to receive more contracts and become further integrated in government activities) — is exactly the dynamic that drives America’s surveillance state. …

[T]o watch U.S. Senators like Sam Brownback actually maintain a straight face while protesting China’s warrantless spying on the email and telephone communications of foreigners, and lamenting that private companies feel unfairly pressured to cooperate with China’s government spying out of fear of losing lucrative business opportunities, is so surreal that it’s actually hard to believe one is seeing it.

Surreal? Exactly the dynamic? This is exactly why the left is so dangerous: It cannot make rational evaluations based on good and evil, so it ends up supporting evil.

China’s government is motivated by its will to stay in power by suppressing political resistance and keeping a tight reign on the rights and freedom of its citizens. America’s government, the Bush administration, knows it will relinquish power peacefully and democratically in January 2009 just as it remembers the attacks that occurred in September 2001, so its motivation is wholly different: to protect America, so its citizens can continue to enjoy safety, rights and freedom.

Further, the Chinese government can do whatever it wants to do because it is authoritarian, lacking all checks and balances. Grrenwald may have missed the fact that the entire matter of electronic surveillance has been vetted thoroughly by our courts and our elected representatives, so this isn’t, as Greenwald characterizes it, simply the Bush administration running renegade again.

That point is completely lost on Greenwald and his readers, as this comment makes clear:

Brownback keeps a straight face because the US does its spying in secret. The Chinese are evil because they say right in the Guest Information that they are watching. Americans would never do that.

Mere parity is not enough for these loons. The left will not stop until they succeed at placing the globe’s repressors on a pedestal and submitting America to mockery.

No Comments yet »

T

he Beijingoists are taking no chances as the countdown to next week’s Olympics races towards the opening ceremony … and possible protests.

According to AP, rallied to action to suppress any protests are 110,000 police, riot squads and special forces, and another 300,000 Olympic volunteers and neighborhood watch members. The figure apparently does not include the Chinese military, which also will be out in force.

Gosh, I just don’t remember security being quite that tight during the ’84 Olympics here in LA …

Last week saw four bomb blasts in Western China, with an Islamist group taking responsibility. And this statement came today from a militant identified by the DC-based monitoring group IntelCenteras as Seyfullah:

“Our aim is to target the most critical points related to the Olympics. We will try to attack Chinese central cities severely using the tactics that have never been employed,” he said.

China discounts such threats and said the recent bombings were not the work of terrorists. Exploding space heaters … meteorites … or something … don’t know for sure.

I despise the regime in Beijing and wish them nothing by ill will. But I also despise Islamists and their similarly totalitarian cruelty. So in this odd case, I’m hoping there’s no violence during the games – but that there are plenty of hitches, little shows of resistance for the cameras, a thousand cuts against the pride of those that crushed the spirit of freedom in Tienanmen Square.

No Comments yet »

Let’s Hear It For Sharia Law!

Here’s the beauty of Islam and its perverted justice system in a nutshell: Keep women uneducated, so they don’t know how to defend themselves, and discourage men from defending them, then you can stone a whole lot of women to death without having to stone too many men! What’s not to love!?

In theory the penalty of stoning to death applies to both men and women.

But the lawyers say that in practice, many more women than men receive the sentence because they are less well educated and often poorly represented in court. (BBC)

And it’s happening again in Iran – that showplace of Islamic rule – as eight women and one man face imminent stoning for sexual sinning. The women were found guilty of adultery or prostitution, the man was found guilty of having sex with one of his students.

One imam, Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, supposedly suspended stoning in 2002, but it hasn’t stopped the practice, and lawyers for the eight say they fear the sentences will be carried out at any time.

And what goes on at Guantanamo is cruel and unusual? Continue Reading »

No Comments yet »

Was Jimmy Carter Right After All?

N

ow there’s a question I bet you thought you’d never be asked, but it’s official: Historian Joseph Wheelan asks it on History News Network in a little piece he titled Is it Safe Now to Admit Jimmy Carter Was Right?.

No, of course he’s not alluding to Carter’s flaccid stand on Iran and terrorism; it’s his 1979 “Crisis of Confidence” speech that’s got Wheelan all hopped up on Karter Kool Aid.

We admirers have long endured ridicule whenever we dared to defend Carter’s prescient plan for reducing U.S. dependence on oil.

But today, after all the abuse and scorn heaped on Jimmy Carter and his supporters, we find ourselves paying more than $4 a gallon at the pump to fill our hulking gas guzzlers.

It turns out that Carter was right after all.

He was?! Let’s review the list of Carter’s “Crisis of Confidence” recommendations:

• Requiring auto manufacturers to deliver by 1995 an auto fleet that tools along at 48 miles per gallon. The Smart Car, which gets very unstable at high speeds, gets 36 mpg. The Prius does get 48 mpg, so we’d need an all-Prius fleet to achieve Carter’s goal. Oh. Boy.
• Asking Americans to turn down their thermostats. Conservation is always a good idea, but the amount of energy saved if all Americans had donned dorky cardigans is a pittance compared to what we now save with energy-efficient systems brought to us not by government mandate as much as free market demand.
• Establishing a tax on “windfall” oil profits to finance a crash program to develop affordable synthetic fuels. Yeah, those synthetic fuels have fared wonderfully. And taxing corporate profits is always a great way to encourage business innovation, which explains all the technological innovation coming out of France.
• Setting a goal of 20 percent solar by … eight years ago. He apparently never computed the cost, which would make $4 a gallon gas seem like a gift, nor amount of acreage that would be required for solar farms, nor the protests of the environmental movement against any such idea.

Wheeler is just another historian who refuses to learn from history and still thinks that somehow government knows better than the free market. Besides being utterly unrealistic, Carter’s ideas are as bad today as they were in 1979. So of course Barack Obama pretty much did a Carter cut-and-paste to come up with his energy policy. Continue Reading »

No Comments yet »

Unhappy PC Birthday

E

verything I have to unlearn, I learned in kindergarten – that’s how Incredible Daughter #1 responded to this story, from BBC:

An eight-year-old boy has sparked an unlikely outcry in Sweden after failing to invite two of his classmates to his birthday party.

The boy’s school says he has violated the children’s rights and has complained to the Swedish Parliament.

The school, in Lund, southern Sweden, argues that if invitations are handed out on school premises then it must ensure there is no discrimination.

Violated rights? What right? The right to be an utter jerk and suffer no consequences? For a school to propose that this is discrimination is to tell kids that the most important life lesson is to expect to get everything without investing anything.

One of the boys who didn’t get an invitation didn’t invite the perp of this horrific social crime to his own birthday party. The other boy simply didn’t get along with birthday boy. No matter! Life is happy! We’re all equal! Kumbayah!

Remember: The Dems think Europe is the cat’s meow and won’t be satified until they’ve morphed American independence and frontier spirit into a clone of Sweden. And Obama’s friend, radical educator William Ayres, is at forefront of the effort to use the schools to accomplish that goal.

A China You Haven’t Seen

S

piegel has a photo gallery posted along with its story Lives Under Chinese Communist, Caught on Film that you ought to take a look at. Here are the two that moved me the most.

First, let’s look at a photo typical of what we see out of China today, symbolic of its emergence on the global economics playing field.

Relaxing on the hood of his new Mercedes is Li Xiaohua who was previously a Red Guard who was forced to the countryside during the Cultural Revolution. His rebirth as a successful capitalist is symbolic of the new China. But we shouldn’t forget that the old China still exists, as shown in this photo of barge-pullers on the upper Yangtse River:

Why are these men naked? Because they own so few clothes that they don’t want to wear them out doing this hard labor.

China has a long way to go, despite the happy face the Beijingoists try to slap on the mess they rule. Continue Reading »

No Comments yet »