« | »

June 5th 2009     

Another Obama Nominee Bites The Dust

Posted by: Laer at 01:09 pm

President Obama’s classification of aggressive interrogation techniques as torture and his wholesale rejection of them  have come home to roost: Not with an act of domestic terror, thank God, but with the demise of yet another Obama nomanee:

Philip Mudd, Obama’s pick for undersecretary of intelligence and analysis at Homeland Security, withdrew his name from consideration today because as deputy director of the Office of Terrorism Analysis at the CIA, he had direct knowledge of the CIA’s harsh interrogation program. No, there’s no evidence he ever turned the volume up or the thermostat down; association is enough when it comes to these programs.

Unless, of course, you’re Nancy Pelosi.

Mudd and his handlers in the admin realized that were his nomination to go forward, it would force the Dems in the Senate to rule on whether mere knowledge of the procedures alone was damning – a no win proposion for them.  Deciding it was better to let that question lie unanswered, Mudd was shown the door.

This situation was raised once before, with John Brennan, who was to become CIA director. Obama solved that little problem by making Brennan a czar of sorts, working in the White House on security issues in a position that needed no confirmation.

Mudd would have headed the department that issued the  highly controversial report on terror threats from the right wing.  Too bad he’s gone – that looks like a department that could use some leadership.

Share

Posted in Obama Drama | No Comments yet » | |

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« | »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here