« | »

April 19th 2009     

Dem Thinkers On Tea Parties

Posted by: Laer at 01:58 pm

D

avid Axelrod and James Carville – the bitter cream that has risen to the top of Dem-think – have chosen the safe haven of CBS to say what they think of one million Americans taking to the streets to complain about Obama’s expensive expansion of government.

Axelrod led off the discussion on “Face the Nation” by sounding like he was channeling the recent DHS report on rightwing terrorism:

I think any time you have severe economic conditions there is always an element of disaffection that can mutate into something that’s unhealthy.

Protest taxes and government expansion today, blow up innocent children tomorrow, eh David? No, not exactly.  In true liberal fashion, when confronted with the outrageousness of his beliefs, he didn’t stand up for them, but backtracked:

Well, this is a country where we value our liberties and our ability to express ourselves, and so far these are expressions.

So far?

Carville, when asked by John King if it’s unhealthy – Axelrod’s word – for “an American to go out and hold a sign and say ‘I think my taxes are too high,’” answered correctly, with a “No.” But he wasn’t content to stay there and went on to call the tea party movement “damaging to Republicans.”

Really?  One million people go out and exercise their rights of protest, don’t break any windows, don’t yell obscenities at the police, and pick up their trash afterwards and somehow it’s damaging to Republicans?  I’d like someone to explain that to me … but not someone dumb enough to say that Obama is cutting taxes for 95 percent of Americans.

Obama lied. Taxpayers cried.

Share

Posted in Economic Policy, Obama, Tea Party USA | No Comments yet » | |

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« | »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here