« Obama’s Car Team Doesn’t Buy American | Photo-Editorializing »

February 23rd 2009     

What Will The Losers Do With Their Bail-Out Money?

Posted by: Laer at 09:58 am

A

merica is the land of dreams and opportunity and all, but really, what’s a bus driver doing with an $800,000 home? (That’s it on the right.)  And why should we bail out her hyper over-extension? Michelle Malkin provides the commentary from an SF Wrongicle sob story:

ACOSTA: Like countless other Americans, Garcia admits she and her husband bought more house than they could afford, but she says the lender made the purchase all too easy. Now her mortgage is worth more than her house.

(on camera): How much was the house when you bought it?

GARCIA: Eight hundred.

ACOSTA: Eight hundred thousand dollars?. And how much is the house worth?

GARCIA: Right now, it’s like $675,000 on the market.

Before you run out of hankies crying for Garcia, consider this comment from a discussion item I posted on a building industry LinkedIn page asking for commentary on the Obama housing bailout:

It will be a good stop-gap and stabilize market prices in many areas of the country. However, long term it will not solve the problem because many of these homeowners will end up back in the same situation. Even if the package paid off their mortgages completely, it wouldn’t be long before they leveraged all of that equity. So it will likely pass, it will likely work short term, and in the end it will fail to make a lasting difference.

Got that? Do you think Rahmbama has thought this through? Do they really think that these overly entitled, bailed out “victims” won’t immediately turn around and draw out the equity boosts they got thanks to non-victims like us?

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

Tags: , ,

Posted in Economic Policy, Housing/Development | 2 Comments » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Trackbacks/Pings

    Comments

  1. Sherry

    What she doesn’t tell us is that she owned at least 3 properties from 2006 to 2008. Poor woman.
    She has owned a condo at 6001 Arlington #721, Falls Church, VA since 1999.
    She purchased 3438 Charles Street, Falls Church, VA on 1/05/05 for $510,000 and sold it on 6/10/08 for $429,000.
    Her current home - 1920 N. Dinwiddie Street, Arlington, Va -was purchased with her husband (Luis Guillermo Flores) on 11/16/06 for $800,000.
    Looks like they just got greedy. Are these the poor people that we’re supposed to help????

  2. Laer

    Question:  how could anyone hold a condo in Falls Church for 3.5 years and sell it for $81,000 LESS than she bought it for?  Do you think maybe she trashed the place?

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« Obama’s Car Team Doesn’t Buy American | Photo-Editorializing »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here