« | »

January 31st 2009     

Daschel Watch

Posted by: Laer at 02:36 pm

I

t’s 2:18 P.M. PST and do you know where Tom Daschle is? I know where he should be following the revelation that he, like Tim Geithner, is a tax dodger. Tom and Tim; how sweet. How crooked. He should be at the top of the page, the lead story – but gosh, it’s hard to find him there.

The NYT home page at this hour has him, but it’s buried at the bottom of the page, a link that doesn’t exactly explode with outrage: Daschle Pays 3 Years of Tax on Use of Car. No mention of overstating charitable contributions or failing to pay tax on consulting income. (In the print edition, the story was above the fold, but liberal NYT readers didn’t care enough to make it one of the most-read stories of the day.)

WaPo, being the house organ of American politics, does a little better.  The story is a sub-story under “Gregg on tap for Cabinet,” near the top of their home page.  The headline:  Nominee Daschle Owed Back Taxes. That’s better – and it’s also WaPo’s most viewed story.

The once mighty LA Times, the only east coast paper on the west coast, has the story on the first screen of its home page under the headline Daschle failed to pay $128,000 in taxes.  It’s the LAT’s sixth most downloaded story … but you know that Suleman woman just had octuplets here.

So what have we learned?  Nothing new.  The NYT is a sewer of liberalism intent on protecting Obama at all costs.  And its readers, so engaged in attacking Bush in the name of American ideals, is on board with Pinch and the bunch.

Share

Posted in Democrats, Media bias, Obama | No Comments yet » | |

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« | »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here