« | »

January 16th 2009     

Watcher’s Winners

Posted by: Laer at 07:43 am

T

he Watcher of Weasels, apparently surviving and thriving in the frigid temps back east, has posted the winners in the Watcher’s Council‘s weekly quest for the blogosphere’s best political analysis.  And as is his wont, he posted them with a nice little essay.

So I’ll quickly say Joshuapundit and Right Truth for the Council and Big Hollywood and Front Page Magazine for the non-Council, and they were my picks, and I got skunked (writing about Obama and FDR).  For the rest, go to the Watcher’s post.

Thanks, Watcher.  Oh, BTW.  It’s going to be 80 degrees out here today.

Share

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments yet » | |

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« | »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here