December 17th 2008
A
re you interested in non-ionizing environmental radiation? No? Well then, how about hysterical and costly global warming projections based on often-faulty models, not real world data? I thought so. Check this out:
That’s 102 years of no significant change in temperature or precipitation, based on real data, even as our society ramped up its CO2 output. I know all the scientists are on board with global warming and the debate is over and all, but the comment came from some pretty scientific guys and gals – the Environmental Radiation section of the Health Physics Society.
As you can see, Mann’s famous “hockey stick” graph shows a dramatic spike in temperature starting about … oh, 1895 or so.
hat-tip: Neil
Posted in Global warming | 1 Comment » | |
Trackbacks/Pings
Leave a Reply
[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Comments
December 17th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
I am told by reliable sources that the “hockey stick” algorithm produces essentially the same graph when fed random data as it does when fed actual temperatures. Draw your own conclusion. Better yet, compare the real data with the predictions, and let me know what you find. I could use a good hockey stick out in my driveway right now, if you have one that’s no good.