« Rev. Wright: Take Note! | The Lies They Teach #20 And #21 »

December 13th 2008     

Truth Depends On What Your Definition Of “I” Is

Posted by: Laer at 01:23 pm

As it became clear that Rod Blagojevich was working to auction off prez-elect Obama’s Senate seat to the highest bidder, Obama spoke on the matter and we remember his words well:

“I had no contact with the governor’s office. I did not speak to the governor about these issues. That I know for certain.”

But who exactly is this “I” that had no contact with the Gov’s office?  Was it “I” as in me, Barack Obama and me alone, or “I” as in the vaunted office of the prez-elect?  Apparently, Obama was speaking as a finely nuanced lawyer/politician because now we learn:

Another source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor’s administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris. The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win.

Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be “acceptable” to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats. …

Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.

That’s some pretty old-school doublespeak for Mr. Change We Can Believe In, eh? “‘I’ didn’t speak to the Gov, but my hand-picked right-hand man shared my thoughts with him, so I’m clean.”

We might as well have elected Hillary.

hat-tip: Flopping Aces

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

Tags: ,

Posted in Obama Drama | No Comments yet » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« Rev. Wright: Take Note! | The Lies They Teach #20 And #21 »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here