« Obama: “A Rare Appearance” In Senate | Vets’ Ad Calls Out Obama On Surge »

October 1st 2008     

Wednesday Reading - Palin/Biden Week

Posted by: Laer at 04:41 pm

Sorry this is late, but trust me, it’s worth it.  As usual, members of the Watcher’s Council (and you, I hope) will read these entries and will vote (not you, sorry) tomorrow evening about the time Sarah Palin takes on Joe Biden.  Winners (of the contest, not the debate) will be posted Friday morning (God willing):

Council Submissions

Non-Council Submissions

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

No tags for this post.

Posted in Watcher's Council | No Comments yet » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« Obama: “A Rare Appearance” In Senate | Vets’ Ad Calls Out Obama On Surge »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here