« Watcher’s Winners - Meltdown Edition | They’re Asking Me About The Debate? »

September 26th 2008     

Media Bias #75

Posted by: Laer at 04:33 pm

Nedra Tells Us What She Thinks

I’d like to introduce you to Nedra Pickler, AP’s newest editorial writer. Here are some samples of her work in a little get-up she titled, The Debate Is On, McCain Agrees to Participate:

McCain had also said he would suspend all campaign activities, but in reality the campaign just shifted to Washington while the work of trying to win the election went on.

When you say “the campaign just shifted to Washingon,” Nedra, do you mean to imply McCain was doing nothing at all to work on the economic crisis? It sure sounds like it.

McCain had taken a gamble with the move, trying to appear above politics and as a leader on an issue that had overshadowed the presidential campaign and given him trouble. But Democratic rival Barack Obama had not bowed to McCain’s challenge, and instead questioned why the Republican nominee couldn’t handle two things at once — the debate and involvement in the bailout negotiations.

Was it a gamble, as in a political gamble obviously, or was it just putting “Nation First?” Nedra’s entitled to her opinion, and she thinks it was a gamble … but how exactly was he “trying to appear above politics?” By going to meetings and discussing the economic bailout? Nedra’s opinion appears to be pretty solidly set, though, and she reinforces it with her phrasing of Obama’s response - a particularly strong phrasing: “had not bowed,” as opposed to “had not agreed to.”

By Friday morning, it appeared McCain was looking for a face-saving way to get to the debate even though a deal had not been reached. He met with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, before heading to his campaign headquarters and issuing a statement that blamed others in Washington for the failure to reach an agreement.

“Face-saving?” Wouldn’t anyone working hard on the bail-out plan, especially the de facto leader of the GOP, meet with McConnell and Boehner? Of course, we all know that as an opinion writer, Nedra is perfectly within her rights to express her viewpoint.

There’s just one catch. You guessed it: This is a news story.

Media Bias 2008 covers pro-Obama media bias in the presidential campaign. Items are listed from most recent to oldest; the numbering reflects this and is not a ranking. Send Media Bias 2008 examples via “comments”‘ below, or to email2laer [@] yahoo [dot] com.

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

No tags for this post.

Posted in Media Bias 2008 | No Comments yet » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« Watcher’s Winners - Meltdown Edition | They’re Asking Me About The Debate? »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here