Comments on: Obama’s Bizarre List Of 40 “Probing” NY Times Stories

By: Laer

Laer — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:25:17 +0000

I think your comment ended up on a different post, TDT. To answer your question, there should be major casualties, why not? We’re getting along just fine without Desoto and Oldsmobile. New economies sift out old wood – the PC did it to computer manufacturers, electricity did it to a host of industries. Car manufacturers that can succeed in the new market should do so without the artificial economy of government life support, and new manufacturers like Fisker or Tesla should take advantage of the moment and sieze market from the old and less relevant.

By: The Daily Times

The Daily Times — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:31:26 +0000

An interesting view of the automotive industry. Where do you see the future of the industry, will it ever recover or will there be major casulties?

By: Watcher of Weasels » Winners On a Day of Financial and Political Turmoil

Watcher of Weasels » Winners On a Day of Financial and Political Turmoil — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:32:32 +0000

[...] Third place with 1 vote – (T*) Cheat-Seeking Missiles – Obama’s Bizarre List Of 40 “Probing” NYT Stories [...]

By: GW

GW — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:47:59 +0000

Superb post, Laer. Obama is possibly the single least vetted presidential candidate in history. Protein Wisdom ran an excellent post the other day speaking to how the distortion in media is distorting democracy - a system that relies on complete and accurate information in order to work. You might be interested in it. http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=13309

By: The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Eye on the Watcher’s Council

The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Eye on the Watcher’s Council — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:14:33 +0000

[...] Cheat-Seeking Missiles, “Obama’s Bizarre List Of 40 “Probing” NYT Stories” [...]

By: Watcher of Weasels » Weasels vs Watchers Council: Submissions in a War on Truth

Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:10:57 +0000

[...] Cheat-Seeking Missiles – Obama’s Bizarre List Of 40 “Probing” NYT Stories [...]

By: BA

BA — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:48:55 +0000

The New York Times did not cover the Taheri’s article on Obama involved in secret and perhaps illegal talks in Iraq. There was enough evidence to warrant coverage. As a matter of fact, this news item does not seem to have been mentioned at all in the NYT.What it cannot spin for Obama, the NYT does not publish. And the NYT regularly publishes articles which could be used to deflect anticipated attacks against Obama. One needs to know what is being discussed in or emerging from the blogosphere to understand the reason for some Obama articles.And the New York Times did know about Edwards.

By: BA

BA — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:26:27 +0000

I did read a probing story published in February 2008 by the New York Times, but against Mr. McCain. A piece of unadulterated trash – in fact no more evidence than Larry Sinclair has against Obama, i.e. nothing – that the Public Editor condemned after more than 1,500 readers complained, adding, however, that the writer had lost a good opportunity to attack McCain on something else by going ahead with his story.