August 30th 2008
Right Of Privacy? Not From The Left!
T
he bloviating hypocrites at Daily Kos is ruminating today that Sarah Palin was never pregnant with a fifth child, but rather was covering up for an unwed daughter’s pregnancy by pulling the old switch-a-roo after the little ‘un was born. Kos offers up this as evidence:
Palin never looked pregnant. Really? Then who’s that chubby gal with the hair piled up in a Palinesque bun?- Palin’s daughter “got mono” and wasn’t in school for a while.
- Palin doesn’t support abortion.
Whoa! What a stunningly definitive case. It takes a sick mind to even conceive of this meme, let alone carry on about it willy-nilly about as if it were newsworthy - especially when one considers that nearly a third of births in Alaska are out of wedlock. Why would Palin take the considerable risk of being caught in such a sordid, dishonest deal when the consequences of having an unmarried daughter with child would be of so little consequence socially or politically?
Worse, the Left has no problem with invading the privacy of Palin and her daughter, and sees no hypocrisy in their cries for a probe into the recent use of their baby-making apparati. Yes, we’re taking about the same Left that howls in genuine outrage if a computer scans data from known terrorists; the same Left that says millions of dead babies is a small price to pay for a woman’s right to privacy.
Kos proves just how hypocritical its fellow travelers are by running a poll asking whether Kos should continue running with the story. 8,778 have responded as of 3:40 p.m. PST:
- 27 percent are sane and stand by liberal principles, saying “No, it’s’ a private matter and you should delete this diary.”
- 56 percent bloodthirsty partisan hypocrites, saying “Yes, the future of the world is at stake [really?!], nothing’s off the table.” [Then can we look into the Obama/Ayres relationship, or should we continue to try to drown out any radio station that gives Stanley Kurtz air time?]
- And 15 percent are postponing their immersion into insanity, saying “Not sure yet, need more evidence.” These numbskulls are not sentient enough to realize that a “yes” answer to the question means more evidence would be gathered since Kos would continue with the story, so “yes” or “no”‘ are the only viable answers.
{Pregnant pause.}
Sometimes, even after all these years, the Left just flat-out stuns me.
![[Post to Twitter]](http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png){kind=icon}
![[Post to Yahoo Buzz]](http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-buzz-micro3.png){kind=icon}
![[Post to Digg]](http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-digg-micro3.png){kind=icon}
![[Post to StumbleUpon]](http://www.cheatseekingmissiles.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-su-micro3.png){kind=icon}
Posted in Abortion, Leftism, Palin | 1 Comment » | 
Print This Post
| 
Email This Post
Comments
August 31st, 2008 at 10:19 pm
This is a great. sane and logical post from our side on this “issue”. What this shows is that the modern left is just disgusting. Can not say a thing about John Edwards. It was in the National Enquirer after all. Oh, but it turns out that they WERE RIGHT! Can’t say a thing about the JUDGEMENT of the Chosen One, Sen. Messiah Barack. So, what was he really doing with his “aquaintance”, William Ayres? But, speard a rumor that never saw the light of day about Gov. Palin and by golly, we should just accept it as fact. And, here is my take on if it WAS true. Once again, she would have been saving two lives. A young daughter who made a mistake in having premarital sex. Gov. Palin should be commended for having such a relationship with her daughter that she would have gone to her in the first place. And the baby. But, once again, it is always OK for the left to dig in the gutter, but never, ever can we say anything, even if it stares us in the face!