« Media Bias #18 | Whose Waterloo? »

July 21st 2008     

Obama In Berlin: Wrong City, Wrong Time

Posted by: Laer at 12:38 pm

B

arack Obama’s planned Berlin speech is the result of egomaniacal overreach by the candidate and his staff. Obama, the new Kennedy. Obama, the new Reagan. Obama, the new Narcissus.

But Kennedy and Reagan spoke in a Berlin that was the symbolic core of the Cold War; it was a platform for bravely confronting a freedom-crushing Soviet empire with the rousing rhetoric of freedom. What is Berlin symbolic of today? Hedonism? Eurocentrism? Anyone? Anyone?

That’s why I like the suggestion made by Tony Campbell at The Moderate Voice:

My suggestion to Obama: forget Berlin, go to Mecca. If you really want to be seen in a Kennedy / Reagan light in the diplomatic arena, you should use your popularity and your unique heritage to address the Christian and Muslim worlds.

Campbell seems to see his suggestion merely in a religious light:

However, the issue is much trickier and more dangerous than either Kennedy or Reagan had to face. Instead of disarming conventional and nuclear weapons, Obama has to disarm fear and prejudice on both sides, Christian and Muslim.

That’s an underestimation of the parallel Campbell’s defined; this is about much more than “fear and prejudice.” Radical Islamism is the common threat freedom-loving folk face today, just as the Soviets were in the 1960s and 1980s. Kennedy and Reagan took the rhetorical war against the Soviets to the city that was the chink stopping the Soviet advance, and spat some powerful, intimidating rhetoric in the direction of Moscow.

What part of the Islamic world is liberated and freedom-loving enough to allow a Western leader to cry out the modern-day counterpart of “I am a Berliner?” No place.

Who is brave enough today to go to Mecca and say “Tear down this jihadism?” No one, least of all Obama.

A meaningful, challenging speech in Mecca is what the world needs, but there’s one little problem Campbell overlooked: The religion of peace does not allow non-Muslims to visit Mecca - and Obama, as we all know, is not a Muslim.

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
Tags: , , ,

Posted in 2008, Islam, Islamism, Obama, Saudi Arabia | 4 Comments » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Trackbacks/Pings

  1. Soccer Dad
  2. The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » Eye on the Watcher’s Council
  3. A Great Honor | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  4. Comments

  5. BA

    In his fluent Indonesian of course.

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« Media Bias #18 | Whose Waterloo? »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here