« RU For An Abortion Solution? | NYT Gets It Right On Nigeria »

February 27th 2006     

Criminals, Despots And Democracy

Posted by: Laer at 12:02 pm

Jackson Diehl’s WaPo column today unravels the complexities of the Russia-Ukraine gas crisis.

Remember that story? Vague, complicated, “over there,” we generally missed the 400% increase Putin wanted to charge for natural gas, Europe’s feverish reaction, and a detente created by a new deal.

But that’s not the story. The story, as Diehl lays it out, is one of Putin’s continuing efforts to keep the Ukraine in the Russian orbit. A Euro-allied Ukraine with Democratic priniciples is such a threat to Putin’s increasingly authoritarian state that he crafted a devil’s deal:

Ukraine’s president, Viktor Yushchenko, and Prime Minister Yuriy Yekhanurov had agreed to purchase Ukraine’s gas through a Swiss trading company whose owners and beneficiaries are publicly unknown — but are rumored to include senior officials and organized crime figures in both Russia and Ukraine. They granted this same shadowy company a 50 percent share in the business of delivering gas to Ukrainian consumers. They accepted a price deal on gas delivered to Ukraine lasting only a few months but guaranteed that rock-bottom rates charged by Ukraine for the storage and transit of Russian gas to the West would be frozen for 25 years.

It’s such a nasty deal that it threatens to turn the Orange Revolution Red. Read the whole piece.

Related Tags: , , , , ,

Share this Logic Bomb with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
No tags for this post.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments yet » | Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recent Posts:

Post URITrackback URI

Leave a Reply

[The "Comment Box" is WYSIWYG except that you have to double space between paragraphs!
Type it the way you want it to look -- Just remember to double up those line spaces.]

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas

« RU For An Abortion Solution? | NYT Gets It Right On Nigeria »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here