Archive for July, 2005

July 29th 2005

Boobs For Peace

I was thinking about the boobs that participated in the Breasts Not Bombs protest (warning: link contains really ugly full public nudity), and two thoughts occured to me.

  1. This is what you get from a lifetime of pot-smoking and acid-dropping. If there ever was a sound argument against legalization of drugs, it’s one look at these aging Berkeley hippies.

  2. Imagine if Bush were to call them tomorrow and say, “You know, you’re right. It should be breasts, not bombs.” Imagine them shipped lock, stock and barrel-chests to Baghdad to protest against the insurgents who kill so many, or even against the US presence. Imagine them then going to Afghanistan to continue their protest, with a stop in Saudi Arabia for good measure.

If they weren’t promptly buried up to their necks and stoned (with real stones this time), they would be lucky. And talk about a recruiting tool for al-Qaeda! Muslims thought America was decadent before? One look at Berkeley’s finest, and all sorts of people would be lining up to strap on some explosives.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 29th 2005

Ich ben ein headline-writer

There’s an interesting post at Asymmetrical Information that refutes the urban myth that when JFK said Ich ben ein Berliner, he actually said he was a jelly donut.

Fine. But when I saw this headline …

Did Kennedy really say he was a jelly donut?

… I thought they were talking about Teddy, not Jack.

It is a reasonable enough headline, after all. His jowly face certainly looks like a jelly donut (or “berliner,” in German). And his weight hints that he may have eaten quite a few of them. Certainly drinks enough that he just might have blurted, “Look at me! I’m a jelly donut!” at some inopportune moment.

Just … let … your … imagination … wander …

Ich ben ein Bridgecrasher!

Share

No Comments yet »

July 29th 2005

Should Muslims Apologize?

Two articles from Real Clear Politics make for interesting context and contrast this morning.

First, Mansour El-Kikhia writes in the San Antonio Express News that American Muslims have nothing at all to apologize for — in fact, America should apologize to them for putting them under surveillance since 9/11:

Does anyone think [American Muslims] are pleased to have their movements and telephone conversations monitored or that coercive and Freedom-depriving laws are tailored for them? Does anyone in his or her right mind really believe that being an Arab American or a Muslim is pleasant in America today?

After the London bombings, I, for one, am not moved by his whining.

El-Kikhia goes on to blame the war on us. Our policies. Our mingling in Arab affairs. Our war in Iraq, for which there is no justification. He undercounts are dead and underplays the blind nature of jihad.

A few clicks down, RCP takes us to the Washington Times, and Wilson John writing about Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf’s inability, or unwillingness, to confront terror in his country.

All the mad Imams he said he would contain proceed uncontained, and listen to what they’re uncontained about:

Lashkar leader Hafiz Saeed publicly announced his resignation and the appointment of the new leadership. It was nothing but a ruse, something the security agencies in Pakistan knew. For several months, Mr. Saeed was not arrested and remained free to spew venom about India and the United States. He was subsequently arrested but not charged with terrorist activities; instead, he was charged with violating a maintenance of public order law that has a maximum punishment of three months. Mr. Saeed has since been freed. Today, he openly conducts prayers from a Lahore mosque every Friday. His sermons, published widely in the Urdu press, have been replete with calls for jihad in Kashmir and elsewhere in the world.

Jihad in Kashmir. El-Kikhia is in complete denial. All over the world, his religion is running schools where hatred against anyone who’s not exactly them is preached. In Indonesia against Christians, in Pakistan against Muslims, in London agains Londoners.

But El-Kikhia is right about one thing. Islam doesn’t owe America an apology. It owes the world an apology.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 29th 2005

Islam’s Mind Is On Fire

In case you missed Hugh’s link to an article in Middle East Times by Youssef M. Ibrahim, a former Middle East correspondent for The New York Times, click and read.

It is a window into the rising frustration moderate Muslims have with jihadis, and the rising fear they have about the probable consequences. Here’s the summation:

In this new cold and hot war, car bombs and suicide bombers here and there will be no match for the arsenal that those Westerners are putting together – an arsenal of laws, intelligence pooling, surveillance by satellites, armies of special forces and indeed, allies inside the Arab world who are tired of having their lives disrupted by demented so-called jihadis or those bearded preachers who, under the guise of preaching, do little to teach and much to ignite the fire, those who know little about Islam and nothing about humanity.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 29th 2005

Why We Can’t Trust CAIR

Sure, CAIR drove through a fatwa against terror, sort of, I guess. But before getting too excited, ask yourself if this isn’t what they’re really all about:

ACLU Wants Investigation into FBI Lodi Terrorist Probe

Civil rights groups want records on the FBI’s investigation into alleged terrorist activity in Lodi. They are concerned investigators have violated the rights of members of Lodi’s Muslim community.

The groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Council on Islamic-American Relations, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, and the Japanese American Citizens League plan to file a Freedom of Information Act request to get records pertaining to the FBI’s investigation into a possible al-Qaeda terrorist cell in Lodi.

The groups want to examine the policies and practices the FBI has used while questioning and detaining dozens of Muslims in the investigation.

Basim Elkarra of the Council on American-Islamic Relations detailed his group’s complaints: “Threats of arrest or deportation used to coerce cooperation, unnecessary use of force, denial of medical treatment and constant FBI surveillance of regular mosque attendees.”

The group says it has eight “verified” incidents of civil rights violations, including threats of deportation, humiliating two people in front of co-workers, threatening to charge people with jaywalking if they didn’t cooperate, and not allowing attorneys to be present during questioning.

You are not against terror if you fight efforts to stop terrorism. Your much-ballyhooed fatwa is useless if you don’t follow it. Here’s what it says:

In the light of the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah we clearly and strongly state:

1. All acts of terrorism targeting civilians are haram (forbidden) in Islam.
2. It is haram for a Muslim to cooperate with any individual or group that is involved in any act of terrorism or violence.
3. It is the civic and religious duty of Muslims to cooperate with law enforcement authorities to protect the lives of all civilians.

Obviously, unless CAIR changes its walk, its talk is not worth the electrons the fatwa is written with.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 28th 2005

Why Berkeley Will Never Catch On

They do things in Berkeley … well, that just leave me speechless.

Before you click here to see what I’m talking about, be forewarned. The link will take you to a display of public nudity called “Breasts Not Bombs.” Really, really ugly public nudity.

Scroll down, if you can take it, to the requisite Bush-as-Nazi T-shirt.

h/t Rantingprofs

Share

No Comments yet »

July 28th 2005

US Fatwa: Not Far Enough

Six weeks shy of the fourth anniversary of Sept. 11, leading American Muslims did what they should have done on Sept. 12, 2001: issued a Fatwa, or religious edict, condeming terrorism.

While it’s a good thing and one we should appreciate, it is also too late, for sure. Worse, it is too little.

If the teachings of the Koran are as clear as the Fatwa says they are — “We issue this fatwa following the guidance of our scripture, the Qur’an, and the teachings of our Prophet Muhammad – peace be upon him.” — why did it take America’s Muslim leaders nearly four years to issue this Fatwa? I’ll tell you why: Because the London terrorists were British natives, that’s why.

Knowing that it is inevitable that an American-born Muslim will sometime soon kill Americans — remember the Lodi Loser — American Islamic leaders decided it was time to turn up the PR machine. CAIR, which led the charge, is more concerned about stopping the profiling of suspected terrorists than it is in stopping terror, and they know once one of them strikes us, they’ll need something like this to slow the profiling tsunami that will follow.

It is too little because only 145 U.S. Muslim organizations and mosques signed on. There are over 2,000 mosques in the United States. Where do the other 1,855+ mosques stand on this Fatwa? And what will the clerics who signed it do to clerics at US mosques where hate is preached?

It is also too little for what it says. This is as strong as the statement gets:

Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of violence against innocent lives. There is no justification in Islam for extremism or terrorism. Targeting civilians’ life and property through suicide bombings or any other method of attack is haram – or forbidden – and those who commit these barbaric acts are criminals, not “martyrs.”

It should have gone on to say that guilty of terrorism will not be received in heaven, and should be banned from taking Hajj to Mecca. This is not my idea, it’s been batted about quite a bit lately.

Why, then, did the writers of this Fatwa not say it?

Update: The Left, of course, is angry at us, not the Muslims. Obsidian Wings quotes this letter to the NYTimes:

[T]he New York Police Department has advised subway riders to be alert for “people” in bulky clothes who sweat or fiddle nervously with bags.

Well, a lot of people wear bulky clothes. A lot of people fiddle with their bags. And for that matter, a lot of people sweat. Could the Police Department be any more general in describing the traits of an Islamic suicide bomber? Could its advice be more useless?

Truth be told, commuters need to be most aware of young men
praying to Allah and smelling like flower water.

To which he adds:

Excuse me, sir. I don’t understand what you’re mumbling…are you praying to Allah? And what’s that cologne you’re wearing?

If there’s one sure way to ensure more moderates join the radicals, it’s ill-concieved, fear-mongering crap like this. America’s Muslims are doing their part. The least the rest of the nation can do is agree to the minor inconviences that show our fellow citizens we’re all in this together.

It’s just too rich, and too stupid, to believe. Does Edward, who authored this post, really think that if we don’t talk about the fact that every terrorist is a Muslim, they will suddenly forget jihad and be our buddies?

Does he really think that stating the obvious is “fear-mongering crap?” Then “the sky is blue” is fear-mongering crap.

Does he really think that getting about 1/18th of American mosques to actually say out loud that terrorism is bad constitutes “doing their part” for American Muslims? I’ll believe that when they start turning in the firebrands and bomb-builders, and not a moment before.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 28th 2005

Did Islamofascists Turn Them Off?

You have to wonder, reading this.

Share

No Comments yet »

July 28th 2005

A Moving Story On Moving Settlers

Carolyn Glick writes in the Jerusalem Post about the nobility of the Israeli settlers who will soon be displaced for no good reason:

Walking among the tens of thousands of Israeli protesters at Moshav Kfar Maimon this week was like being witness to a miracle. There in the scorching summer heat were thousands upon thousands of families with children of all ages, young men and women and elderly people, living under siege and in conditions that would make an infantryman cringe.

And yet, there was no complaining. There was no shouting. There was no pushing. There was no garbage on the ground. There was no stench of any kind. What one saw in the protesters’ faces and heard in each and every statement and conversation was dignity, determination, integrity, faith and a form of earthy, plainspoken and unabashed patriotism and concern for the greater good that has become an artifact of a barely remembered past for many Israelis.

In witnessing this – when just outside were 20,000 soldiers and policemen, laying concertina wire along the fence penning these people in as if they were terrorists, and standing arms locked in row upon row, poised to pounce at them at the slightest provocation – it was, indeed, hard to shake off the sense that one was watching a miracle happen.

It’s a long, three-jump story. It’ll drive you crazy about the situation and give you great respect for the people being forced out of their homes and off their farms.

h/t Jim

Share

No Comments yet »

July 28th 2005

Loss Of A Dear (Electronic) Friend

My beautiful Sony Vaio died yesterday and I have to admit … I’m feeling really terrible about it.

It is the prettiest computer I have ever seen. Sculpted brushed aluminum with bezeled edges. No clutzy clasp to open it; instead beautiful counterweighted hinges that let me just open it and close it. Very trick side design that is a delight to look at. Plus it rocked — fast, efficient, light, and until yesterday, trustworthy.

We’re shipping it back to Sony to see if it can be saved, but a Dell laptop is on order just in case. I’m prepared to be underwhelmed by a functional, uninspired design.

Sigh. Lost beauty is a mournful thing.

Share

No Comments yet »

« Prev - Next »

With Obama winning the presidency by seven percent, we can't blame the media. Their laudatory coverage and refusal to extensively probe into Obama's background and [lack of] experience was at best responsible for five percent of his vote, the pundits tell us. Here is a compilation of over 100 significant instances of pro-Obama/anti-McCain bias during the 2008 campaign.

For all 'Media Bias 2008' – Click Here